CODSWALLOP

Dihydrofolate reductase

Homo sapiens · seed P00374 · 187 aa · family defined as ≥30% identity to that seed · compiled 07 October 2026

CATH and SCOP identifiers come from the RCSB's own structure annotations, which the Domains panel already reads, so these are looked up rather than guessed at.

402Entries 402Entities 96Constructs 40Organisms 392Ligand-bound
0.92 ÅBest res.
2.00 ÅMedian res.

Every figure here is counted over the whole family rather than quoted from one entry.

The reference structure

1BOZ, the structure every other member of this family is superposed onto. Rendered by the RCSB and embedded here: the live app shows an interactive viewport, which a document that fetches nothing cannot.

Rendered structure of 1BOZ
1BOZ at the RCSB · open it in the 3D viewer

Which residues anyone has ever seen

How many of this family's constructs contain each residue of the seed. A trough is a stretch nobody has put in a construct, which is a construct-design answer rather than a disorder one.

193187402 constructs

Constructs, most-used first

96 distinct constructs across 402 entries. 250 polymer entities differ from the UniProt canonical sequence in some way, 82 carry a recognised expression tag and 0 carry a fusion partner.

"Differs from canonical" is not the same as "engineered". The canonical sequence is the full gene product, so a secreted protein whose structures all start after its signal peptide counts every one of them as different: lysozyme's most-used construct, residues 19–147 on 1,239 entities, is simply the mature protein. Read the construct column below for what was actually done, rather than this count.

EntitiesLengthBest (Å)Best entryWhat was made
50 186 1.05 1KMV residues 2-187
27 179 1.20 5SD5 His6; Thrombin site; M1S, T2H
22 608 1.97 6KP7 matches the canonical sequence
21 206 1.45 3NZB matches the canonical sequence
20 161 1.40 6DDW matches the canonical sequence
19 187 1.20 4M6J matches the canonical sequence
19 521 2.53 6PF8 matches the canonical sequence
14 192 1.60 1AOE S2L, K84E
13 159 1.49 6DDP residues 3-161
13 173 1.10 8F80 His6; C89S, E96A
10 608 2.20 6A2M matches the canonical sequence
9 162 residues 2-163
9 227 1.60 3CSE His8
8 189 1.70 8DFR matches the canonical sequence
8 566 2.20 4EIL 2 internal deletions
7 166 2.10 4ELG Thrombin site
6 610 2.05 7FGX matches the canonical sequence
5 521 1.80 5T7O matches the canonical sequence
5 521 2.40 2H2Q H32R, L55V, R137Q
4 165 1.90 3S9U I2R
4 168 2.08 3JWK His6; I2R, Y102F
4 178 1.90 3TQ8 His10; TEV site
4 186 1.40 3D80 residues 2-187
4 204 1.65 9Y7U matches the canonical sequence
4 208 1.30 8CRH matches the canonical sequence

Showing the 25 most-used of 96.

Positions people deliberately mutate

Columns where the wild-type residue still dominates but a real minority carries something else, which is a different question from "what varies across species".

H131V 70% Q103S 69% V11Q 69% M15G 69% P83M 69% L90V 68% K99S 68% S120Q 68% H128Y 67% E63A 66% K123A 66% N127P 66% K174N 66% L167T 66% E162T 66% S12A 65% M112R 65% E79Q 65% V170T 65% D96E 65% N20G 65% M126L 65% N108G 65% I176L 65% K19R 65% P84A 65% S91G 64% E82F 64% D187L 64% N14S 64%

What it assembles into

Oligomeric stateChainsEntriesShare
monomeric1 292 72.6%
dimeric2 105 26.1%
tetrameric4 5 1.2%

272 entries have the depositor's assembly corroborated by PISA, 127 carry the depositor's word alone and 3 were assigned by PISA where the depositor gave none. The middle figure is not a disagreement: PISA may have returned nothing or never run. 28 entries carry more than one assembly with different chain counts, so they have no single answer to quote: 1DR1, 1DR2, 1DR3, 1DR4, 2H2Q, 3CL9, 3S3V, 4KY8, 4Q0E, 5UJF, 6NNC, 6NND, 6NNE, 6NNH, 6NNI, 6VS5, 6VS6, 6VS8, 6VS9, 6VSD.

Domain architecture

Every source's own domains on the seed axis, one row each. They are not merged: Pfam, CATH, SCOP and InterPro disagree about boundaries, and a merged track would state a consensus none of them gave.

CATHDihydrofolate Reductase, sSCOP2BDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-liDihydrofolate reductase-li193187
DomainSourceSpan (seed)Chains
Dihydrofolate Reductase, subunit ACATH 3.40.430.10 8–187 307
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8040487 2–187 88
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8032732 2–187 7
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8041552 4–187 14
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8068933 5–187 4
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8032748 8–187 16
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8068941 11–172 22
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8077793 11–187 11
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8101343 14–176 18
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8032717 17–178 9
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8032249 17–187 9
Dihydrofolate reductase-likeSCOP2B 8093486 19–177 4

What binds it

NDP NDP244 entries NAP NAP108 entries UMP UMP57 entries MTX MTX34 entries FOL FOL20 entries UFP UFP16 entries TOP TOP14 entries CB3 CB313 entries CP6 CP610 entries MMV MMV9 entries 1CY 1CY6 entries DH1 DH15 entries
ComponentClassNameEntriesBest (Å)
NDPcofactor Nadph Dihydro-Nicotinamide-Adenine-Dinucleotide Phosphate 244 1.05
NAPcofactor Nadp Nicotinamide-Adenine-Dinucleotide Phosphate 108 0.92
SO4ion Sulfate Ion 84 0.92
UMPligand 2'-Deoxyuridine 5'-Monophosphate 57 1.80
EDOcryoprotectant 1,2-Ethanediol 42 1.10
GOLcryoprotectant Glycerol 41 1.10
MTXligand Methotrexate 34 1.70
PO4ion Phosphate Ion 30 1.69
CLion Chloride Ion 30 1.25
COion Cobalt (Ii) Ion 24 1.52
FOLcofactor Folic Acid 20 0.93
CAion Calcium Ion 19 1.70
UFPligand 5-Fluoro-2'-Deoxyuridine-5'-Monophosphate 16 2.53
TOPligand Trimethoprim 14 1.40
CB3ligand 10-Propargyl-5,8-Dideazafolic Acid 13 2.20
CP6ligand 5-(4-Chloro-Phenyl)-6-Ethyl-Pyrimidine-2,4-Diamine 10 1.30
MMVligand 3-(2-{3-[(2,4-Diamino-6-Ethylpyrimidin-5-Yl)oxy]propoxy}phenyl)p 9 0.92
MESbuffer 2-(N-Morpholino)-Ethanesulfonic Acid 8 1.56
1CYligand 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-6,6-Dimethyl-1,6-Dihydro-1,3,5-Triazine-2,4-D 6 1.52
DH1ligand 2,4-Diamino-5-[2-Methoxy-5-(4-Carboxybutyloxy)benzyl]pyrimidine 5 1.23

How it crystallises

Parsed from the free text 365 depositors typed into _exptl_crystal_grow.pdbx_details, out of 370 entries that recorded anything at all. Median pH 6.8 (range 4.0 to 9.5).

Precipitants

PEG × Ammonium sulfate × Lithium sulfate × Ethanol × Magnesium chloride × Calcium chloride × MPD × Sodium citrate × Sodium chloride × Isopropanol × Sodium malonate × Sodium formate × Dioxane ×

Buffers

MES × Tris × Sodium acetate × Citrate × HEPES × Imidazole × Phosphate × Glycine × Bis-Tris × Sodium cacodylate × Bis-Tris propane × CHES ×

Which entries to trust

402 entries carry a wwPDB validation report: 147 clean, 122 worth a check and 133 with something to explain. Median clashscore 7.31, median RSRZ outliers 2.75%, median R-free minus R-work 0.043. 362 have released structure factors.

Across species

OrganismEntriesBest (Å)Ligand-boundSeed covered
Homo sapiens89 1.05 88 100%
Plasmodium falciparum37 1.97 37 91%
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv35 1.20 35 59%
Pneumocystis carinii24 1.45 24 79%
Mycobacterium tuberculosis23 1.23 23 59%
Cryptosporidium hominis23 2.53 23 98%
Mycobacterium ulcerans Agy9919 0.92 19 80%
Candida albicans17 1.60 17 76%
Bacillus anthracis16 1.65 15 95%
Toxoplasma gondii14 2.05 14 95%
Nakaseomyces glabratus10 1.60 10 80%
Lacticaseibacillus casei10 1.70 9 74%

Seed sequence

187 residues, numbered every ten. Every identity figure in this document is measured against this sequence.

active or binding site modified residue or glycosylation disulphide cysteine transmembrane or signal the 15 most-substituted positions

1MVGSLNCIVA VSQNMGIGKN GDLPWPPLRN EFRYFQRMTT TSSVEGKQNL VIMGKKTWFS
61IPEKNRPLKG RINLVLSREL KEPPQGAHFL SRSLDDALKL TEQPELANKV DMVWIVGGSS
121VYKEAMNHPG HLKLFVTRIM QDFESDTFFP EIDLEKYKLL PEYPGVLSDV QEEKGIKYKF
181EVYEKND

Sites are UniProt's curated features where the seed is a UniProt accession; the substituted positions are measured from this family's own alignment rather than annotated, and only the fifteen most substituted are marked: every position carrying a minority substitution would be most of the protein, because the family holds orthologues. A residue can carry more than one and is drawn with the first that applies, in the order of the key above.

Primary citations

One record per paper, not per entry.

YearCitation
2026 Evolutionary Convergence on a Dihydrofolate Reductase Mutation Drives Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Resistance in Burkholderia thailandensis. Acs Infect Dis. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.5c01132
2026 Repurpose antimalarials to target Toxoplasma gondii dihydrofolate reductase thymidylate synthase. Eur.J.Med.Chem. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2026.118863
2025 A virtual screening strategy to repurpose antifolate compounds as W.bancrofti DHFR inhibitors. Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2025.130370
2025 Structural insights into a plant-conserved DHFR-TS reveal a selective herbicide target. Mol Plant doi:10.1016/j.molp.2025.06.016
2024 Rational Exploration of 2,4-Diaminopyrimidines as DHFR Inhibitors Active against Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium , Two Emerging Human Pathogens. J.Med.Chem. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01594
2024 Flexible 2,4-diaminopyrimidine bearing a butyrolactone as Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. Bioorg.Chem. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.107789
2024 Novel flexible biphenyl Pf DHFR inhibitors with improved antimalarial activity. Rsc Med Chem doi:10.1039/d4md00197d
2024 Identification of Innovative Folate Inhibitors Leveraging the Amino Dihydrotriazine Motif from Cycloguanil for Their Potential as Anti- Trypanosoma brucei Agents. Acs Infect Dis. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00113
2023 Crystal structure of dihydrofolate reductase from the emerging pathogenic fungus Candida auris. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol doi:10.1107/S2059798323004709
2023 Discovery of rigid biphenyl Plasmodium falciparum DHFR inhibitors using a fragment linking strategy. Rsc Med Chem doi:10.1039/d3md00242j
2023 Crystal structure of dihydrofolate reductase from the filarial nematode W. bancrofti in complex with NADPH and folate. Plos Negl Trop Dis doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011303
2022 Structural Insight into Effective Inhibitors' Binding to Toxoplasma gondii Dihydrofolate Reductase Thymidylate Synthase. Acs Chem.Biol. doi:10.1021/acschembio.1c00627
2022 MANORAA: A machine learning platform to guide protein-ligand design by anchors and influential distances. Structure doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.09.004
2021 Discovery of new non-pyrimidine scaffolds as Plasmodium falciparum DHFR inhibitors by fragment-based screening. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem doi:10.1080/14756366.2020.1854244
2020 Using a Fragment-Based Approach to Identify Alternative Chemical Scaffolds Targeting Dihydrofolate Reductase fromMycobacterium tuberculosis. Acs Infect Dis. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00263
2020 The Structural Basis for Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Inhibition of Human Dihydrofolate Reductase. J.Med.Chem. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00546
2020 Flexible diaminodihydrotriazine inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase: Binding strengths, modes of binding and their antimalarial activities. Eur.J.Med.Chem. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112263
2020 Targeting the TS dimer interface in bifunctional Cryptosporidium hominis TS-DHFR from parasitic protozoa: Virtual screening identifies novel TS allosteric inhibitor Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.127292
2019 Drugging the Folate Pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: The Role of Multi-targeting Agents. Cell Chem Biol doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.02.013
2019 Crystal structures of the closed form of Mycobacterium tuberculosis dihydrofolate reductase in complex with dihydrofolate and antifolates. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol doi:10.1107/S205979831900901X
2019 6-Hydrophobic aromatic substituent pyrimethamine analogues as potential antimalarials for pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Bioorg.Med.Chem. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2019.115158
2019 Structure activity relationship towards design of cryptosporidium specific thymidylate synthase inhibitors. Eur.J.Med.Chem. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111673
2019 Discovery of Selective Toxoplasma gondii Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Toxoplasmosis. J. Med. Chem. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01754
2019 Understanding the structural basis of species selective, stereospecific inhibition for Cryptosporidium and human thymidylate synthase. Febs Lett. doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13474
2018 Hybrid Inhibitors of Malarial Dihydrofolate Reductase with Dual Binding Modes That Can Forestall Resistance. ACS Med Chem Lett doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00389
2017 Structure and kinetics assays of recombinant Schistosoma mansoni dihydrofolate reductase. Acta Trop. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.03.007
2016 Protein rethreading: A novel approach to protein design. Sci Rep doi:10.1038/srep26847
2016 Propargyl-Linked Antifolates Are Potent Inhibitors of Drug-Sensitive and Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Plos One doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161740
2016 Discovery of Potent and Selective Leads against Toxoplasma gondii Dihydrofolate Reductase via Structure-Based Design. ACS Med Chem Lett doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6b00328
2015 Structure-activity correlations for three pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine antifolates binding to human and Pneumocystis carinii dihydrofolate reductase. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun doi:10.1107/S2053230X15008468
2015 Structural genomics for drug design against the pathogen Coxiella burnetii. Proteins doi:10.1002/prot.24841
2014 Mycobacterium tuberculosis Dihydrofolate Reductase Reveals Two Conformational States and a Possible Low Affinity Mechanism to Antifolate Drugs. Structure doi:10.1016/j.str.2013.09.022
2014 Propargyl-Linked Antifolates are Dual Inhibitors of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. J.Med.Chem. doi:10.1021/jm401916j
2014 The Structure and Competitive Substrate Inhibition of Dihydrofolate Reductase from Enterococcus faecalis Reveal Restrictions to Cofactor Docking. Biochemistry doi:10.1021/bi401104t
2014 Structural studies provide clues for analog design of specific inhibitors of Cryptosporidium hominis thymidylate synthase-dihydrofolate reductase. Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.07.049
2013 Divergent evolution of protein conformational dynamics in dihydrofolate reductase. Nat.Struct.Mol.Biol. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2676
2013 Kinetic and structural analysis for potent antifolate inhibition of Pneumocystis jirovecii, Pneumocystis carinii, and human dihydrofolate reductases and their active-site variants. Antimicrob.Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00172-13
2013 Elucidating features that drive the design of selective antifolates using crystal structures of human dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry doi:10.1021/bi400852h
2013 Design, Synthesis, and Molecular Modeling of Novel Pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine Analogues As Antifolates; Application of Buchwald-Hartwig Aminations of Heterocycles. J.Med.Chem. doi:10.1021/jm400086g
2013 Functional significance of evolving protein sequence in dihydrofolate reductase from bacteria to humans. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA doi:10.1073/pnas.1307130110